Lamb v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Lamb v. State

147 So. 3d 830, 2013 Miss. LEXIS 670, 2013 WL 9187269

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 19, 2013·No. No. 2011-CT-00369-SCT·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter is before the undersigned Justice on the Motion for Reconsideration filed by William H. Lamb, pro se. On October 24, 2013, this Court dismissed Lamb’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Lamb now requests reconsideration of that ruling. Yet “[n]either an acceptance nor a rejection of a petition for certiorari shall be subject to further pleading by a party for rehearing or reconsideration.” M.R.A.P. 17(f). Based thereon, the undersigned Justice finds that this motion should be denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration filed by William H. Lamb, pro se, is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael K. Randolph MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter is before the undersigned Justice on the Motion for Reconsideration filed by William H. Lamb, pro se. On October 24, 2013, this Court dismissed Lamb’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Lamb now requests reconsideration of that ruling. Yet “[n]either an acceptance nor a rejection of a petition for certiorari shall be subject to further pleading by a party for rehearing or reconsideration.” M.R.A.P. 17(f). Based thereon, the undersigned Justice finds that this motion should be denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration filed by William H. Lamb, pro se, is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael K. Randolph MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE

Lamb v. State, 147 So. 3d 830, 2013 Miss. LEXIS 670, 2013 WL 9187269 (Mich. 2013).

Pincite

147 So. 3d 830 (Lamb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.