Lamb v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Lamb v. Smith

1 Root 419

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 15, 1792

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 419 (Lamb v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamb v. Smith, 1 Root 419 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of tie County Court affirmed. Tie legacy is given to said Betsey to be paid by tie defendant and said Join in equal moieties witMn one year after tie decease of tie testator, and to be’put upon interest; if they neglected to pay it by tie time they ought to pay tie interest. Mr. Bosseter was appointed by tie will a hind of superintendent or guardian to said Betsey as to this legacy, but had no kind of interest in it. His accepting or refusing the trust can have no effect upon tie negro woman’s interest in it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of tie County Court affirmed. Tie legacy is given to said Betsey to be paid by tie defendant and said Join in equal moieties witMn one year after tie decease of tie testator, and to be’put upon interest; if they neglected to pay it by tie time they ought to pay tie interest. Mr. Bosseter was appointed by tie will a hind of superintendent or guardian to said Betsey as to this legacy, but had no kind of interest in it. His accepting or refusing the trust can have no effect upon tie negro woman’s interest in it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-smith-conn-1792.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack