Lamb v. Rigdon
This text of 81 S.E. 447 (Lamb v. Rigdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Error is assigned on the sole ground that the court erred in overruling a motion for a new trial, based only upon the statutory grounds, somewhat amplified. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the -allegations in the plaintiff’s petition, and, upon these allegations and the testimony evidently accepted by the jury, the verdict rendered was not excessive. Taking this view of the record, this court has neither the inclination nor the power to say that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 S.E. 447, 14 Ga. App. 504, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-rigdon-gactapp-1914.