Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance

191 S.E. 56, 183 S.C. 345, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 112

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 16, 1937

Docket14468

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 191 S.E. 56 (Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance, 191 S.E. 56, 183 S.C. 345, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 112 (S.C. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This case, by M. C. Lamb, plaintiff-appellant, against the Metropolitan Mutual Eire Insurance Company, defendant-respondent, was commenced in the County Court for Rich-land County, August 12, 1936, and the purpose of the action was to recover judgment in connection with an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, and the case comes to this Court on appeal from an order of his Plonor, the County Judge, sustaining the demurrer of the defendant to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.

After due consideration of the record in the case, we are satisfied that the trial Judge reached the right conclusion in sustaining the demurrer. The exceptions are, therefore, overruled and the judgment of the lower Court affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Eishburne concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This case, by M. C. Lamb, plaintiff-appellant, against the Metropolitan Mutual Eire Insurance Company, defendant-respondent, was commenced in the County Court for Rich-land County, August 12, 1936, and the purpose of the action was to recover judgment in connection with an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, and the case comes to this Court on appeal from an order of his Plonor, the County Judge, sustaining the demurrer of the defendant to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.

After due consideration of the record in the case, we are satisfied that the trial Judge reached the right conclusion in sustaining the demurrer. The exceptions are, therefore, overruled and the judgment of the lower Court affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Eishburne concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.E. 56, 183 S.C. 345, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-metropolitan-mutual-fire-insurance-sc-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack