Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance

191 S.E. 56, 183 S.C. 345, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 112
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 16, 1937·No. 14468·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This case, by M. C. Lamb, plaintiff-appellant, against the Metropolitan Mutual Eire Insurance Company, defendant-respondent, was commenced in the County Court for Rich-land County, August 12, 1936, and the purpose of the action was to recover judgment in connection with an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, and the case comes to this Court on appeal from an order of his Plonor, the County Judge, sustaining the demurrer of the defendant to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.

After due consideration of the record in the case, we are satisfied that the trial Judge reached the right conclusion in sustaining the demurrer. The exceptions are, therefore, overruled and the judgment of the lower Court affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Eishburne concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance, 191 S.E. 56, 183 S.C. 345, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 112 (S.C. 1937).

191 S.E. 56 (Lamb v. Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. Kaiser Jeep Corp.
40 F.R.D. 89 (D. South Carolina, 1966)
Blackmon v. Independent Life & Accident Insurance
91 S.E.2d 709 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)
Blackman v. IND. LIFE AND ACC. INS. CO.
91 S.E.2d 709 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)
Stuckey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
11 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)