Lamb v. Meisser

19 A.D.2d 782, 243 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3257
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 27, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.2d 782 (Lamb v. Meisser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamb v. Meisser, 19 A.D.2d 782, 243 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, to validate the petitions designating Ronald W. Lamib, John A. Carroll and Ellen Seid as nominees, .to be voted upon at the forthcoming .primary election, for the party positions of committeemen and committeewoman, respectively, of the County Committee of the Republican party from election districts in •the City of Glen Cove, County of Nassau, the said candidates appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 23, 1963, upon the decision of the court after a hearing, which dismissed the petition in this proceeding, Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, -and matter remitted to the Special Term for a hearing on the merits and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. The Special Term dismissed the petition in this proceeding on two grounds: (1) that the copy of the papers served upon respondents failed to contain a conformed copy of the verification which was in fact attached to the original petition; and (2) that the designating petitions, as delivered in sealed envelopes to the Board of Elections, consisted, of many loose sheets which were not bound or stapled together, even though they were numbered consecutively. In our opinion, these omissions constituted mere irregularities which in no way affected the substance or the validity of the petitions. It is to be noted that the statute (Election'Law, § 136, sulbd. 1) does not make the requirement of “ binding together” mandatory; nor does the statute preclude the court, by reason of the failure to physically join the consecutively numbered loose sheets, from treating them as valid petitions. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scaringe v. Kinley
154 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Contessa v. McCarthy
54 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.2d 782, 243 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-meisser-nyappdiv-1963.