Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Lamb v. Medlock

Lamb v. Medlock

152 S.E. 624, 41 Ga. App. 275, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 529
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 5, 1930
Docket20151
StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.E. 624 (Lamb v. Medlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamb v. Medlock, 152 S.E. 624, 41 Ga. App. 275, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 529 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The petition as amended does not set out a cause of action against either of the defendants, and was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., eoneur. T. N. Brown, for plaintiff. A. 8. Bradley, Price & Spivey, A. 8. Bradley, Jr., for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 S.E. 624, 41 Ga. App. 275, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-medlock-gactapp-1930.