Lamb v. Mason

45 Vt. 500
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wheeler, J.

In West River Bank v. Gale, 42 Vt. 27, it was held that under the statutes of this state the homestead of a debtor was exempt from attachment upon debts contracted after the filing of the deed of the homestead for record in the town clerk’s office, and before the occupation of the premises by the debtor as a homestead. There have been several sessions of the legislature since that decision was made and published, and no change has been made in the statutes that received that construction, and it must be regarded as settled. Thefe is nothing in this case to distinguish it from that in principle, and accordingly it must be •held that no title to the premises set out to the defendant as a homestead was acquired by the levy.

Judgment reversed, and judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. Mason, 45 Vt. 500 (Vt. 1873).

45 Vt. 500 (Lamb v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weale v. Lund
2006 VT 66 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2006)
In Re Soter
26 B.R. 838 (D. Vermont, 1983)
Sharp v. Stewart
84 S.W. 963 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
In re Marquette
103 F. 777 (D. Vermont, 1900)
Woodbury v. Warren
67 Vt. 251 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1894)
Finnegan v. Prindeville
83 Mo. 517 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Spaulding v. Crane
46 Vt. 292 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1873)