Lamb v. Lamb
677 So. 2d 39, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6922, 1996 WL 366291
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1996
DocketNos. 95-1285, 95-1286
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 677 So. 2d 39 (Lamb v. Lamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lamb v. Lamb, 677 So. 2d 39, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6922, 1996 WL 366291 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
We affirm the three probate orders which are the subject of these consolidated appeals, which we have concluded are without prejudice to the appellants litigating the issue of whether the appellee breached a pre-nuptial agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lamb v. Lamb
763 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
ROOFCRAFT INTERN., INC. v. Thomas
677 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
677 So. 2d 39, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6922, 1996 WL 366291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-lamb-fladistctapp-1996.