Lamb v. Hyde
223 F.2d 646, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 181
This text of 223 F.2d 646 (Lamb v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lamb v. Hyde, 223 F.2d 646, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 181 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the appellants’ motion for a preliminary injunction and granting the appellees’ motion to dismiss. We affirm on the ground that appellants have failed to exhaust the prescribed administrative remedy. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Co., 1938, 303 U.S. 41, 50-51, 58 S.Ct. 459, 82 L.Ed. 638.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.
303 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 F.2d 646, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-hyde-cadc-1955.