Lamb v. Drew

20 Iowa 15
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided January 25, 1865·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lowe, Ch. J.

i. iOTtracSwe entry tamer. the motion to dismiss was weil made and properly sustained. the purpose of the bill is to restrain proceedings at law; upon wbat ground ? Not that any fraud, mistake, accident, surprise, or even irregularity had intervened therein. All the matters complained of, occurred antecedently to the action of forcible entry and detainer, and could have been urged, and it may be, were urged, as a defence to that action. There is, in the bill, no averment of any kind, impeaching the validity of the proceedings before the magistrate. the jurisdiction is not questioned; nothing subsequent to the rendition of the judgment is relied on. Indeed, scarcely the semblance of the case is made, to justify a court of equity to interfere.

Tbe judgment will stand

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. Drew, 20 Iowa 15 (iowa 1865).

20 Iowa 15 (Lamb v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schuldt v. Lee
284 N.W. 89 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Cannon
49 F. 517 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana, 1892)
Purczell v. Smidt
21 Iowa 540 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1866)