Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry Cnty.

Indiana Supreme Court

Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry Cnty.

97 N.E.3d 606

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 2018

DocketSupreme Court Case No. 18S–MI–00198

StatusPublished

This text of 97 N.E.3d 606 (Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry Cnty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry Cnty., 97 N.E.3d 606 (Ind. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana

By order dated April 13, 2018, the Court granted a petition seeking transfer of jurisdiction from the Court of Appeals. After further review, including consideration of the points presented by counsel at oral argument and discussion among the Justices in conference after the oral argument, the Court has determined that it should not assume jurisdiction over this appeal and that the Court of Appeals opinion reported as Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry County Indiana Auditor, 80 N.E.3d 257 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), should be reinstated as Court of Appeals precedent.

Accordingly, the order granting transfer is VACATED and transfer is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 58(B), this appeal is at an end.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana

By order dated April 13, 2018, the Court granted a petition seeking transfer of jurisdiction from the Court of Appeals. After further review, including consideration of the points presented by counsel at oral argument and discussion among the Justices in conference after the oral argument, the Court has determined that it should not assume jurisdiction over this appeal and that the Court of Appeals opinion reported as Lamasco Redevelopment, LLC v. Henry County Indiana Auditor, 80 N.E.3d 257 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), should be reinstated as Court of Appeals precedent.

Accordingly, the order granting transfer is VACATED and transfer is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 58(B), this appeal is at an end.

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 N.E.3d 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamasco-redevelopment-llc-v-henry-cnty-ind-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack