Lamar v. United States

Supreme Court

Lamar v. United States

254 U.S. 616, 41 S. Ct. 147, 65 L. Ed. 440, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1140

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 13, 1920

DocketNo. 140

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 616 (Lamar v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamar v. United States, 254 U.S. 616, 41 S. Ct. 147, 65 L. Ed. 440, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1140 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted December 6, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920, Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288. And see Boise Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 98, 100; Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197; Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60-61. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline for r laintiffs in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. Henry S. Mitchell for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted December 6, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920, Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288. And see Boise Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 98, 100; Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197; Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60-61. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline for r laintiffs in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. Henry S. Mitchell for the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 616, 41 S. Ct. 147, 65 L. Ed. 440, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamar-v-united-states-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack