Lamar v. Sypien

485 So. 2d 23, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6830
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1986·No. No. 85-1157·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The trial court erred in setting aside the default entered by the clerk and denying appellant’s motion for judgment of default. The appellant brought an action for forfeiture, pursuant to Florida Statutes 932.701-932.704, of $2,000 found in a suspicious package at the Orlando International Airport. Appellee, the sender of the package, was given proper notice and was personally served in court with the complaint requiring an answer within twenty days. The complaint and notice of forfeiture proceedings were prepared in compliance with Florida Statute 932.704 and this court’s decision in In Re: Forfeiture of One 1976 Chevrolet Corvette, V1N1Z37L6541240, 442 So.2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. for rev. den. 451 So.2d 849 (Fla.1984). When appellee did not answer, the appellant obtained a default entered by the clerk.

To set aside a judgment of default the movant must set forth a valid defense and show excusable neglect. TPM Constructors, Inc. v. Twin Coast Title, Inc., 425 So.2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA), pet. for rev. den. 434 So.2d 889 (Fla.1983). The trial court stated that appellee had set forth a valid defense. However, there is nothing in the record which establishes the existence of excusable neglect. The order is quashed and this cause remanded for entry of judgment for appellant.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamar v. Sypien, 485 So. 2d 23, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

485 So. 2d 23 (Lamar v. Sypien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Forfeiture of One 1976 Chev. Corvette
442 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
TPM Constructors, Inc. v. Twin Coast Tile, Inc.
425 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)