Lamar v. Chisholm

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lamar v. Chisholm

77 Ga. 306

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 9, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 77 Ga. 306 (Lamar v. Chisholm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamar v. Chisholm, 77 Ga. 306 (Ga. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

The question here is, are the monthly wages of a clerk and bookkeeper subject to garnishment?

This is not an open question in this court. In the case of Smith vs. Johnston, 71 Ga. 748, this court held that the wages of a' clerk for a line of railroad, known as the Green Line, were not subject to garnishment. This decision was made on the authority of the cases reported in 46 Ga. 466; 54 Id. 108; 25 Id. 571.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, Justice.

The question here is, are the monthly wages of a clerk and bookkeeper subject to garnishment?

This is not an open question in this court. In the case of Smith vs. Johnston, 71 Ga. 748, this court held that the wages of a' clerk for a line of railroad, known as the Green Line, were not subject to garnishment. This decision was made on the authority of the cases reported in 46 Ga. 466; 54 Id. 108; 25 Id. 571.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 Ga. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamar-v-chisholm-ga-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack