Lamar v. Chisholm
77 Ga. 306
Opinion
The question here is, are the monthly wages of a clerk and bookkeeper subject to garnishment?
This is not an open question in this court. In the case of Smith vs. Johnston, 71 Ga. 748, this court held that the wages of a' clerk for a line of railroad, known as the Green Line, were not subject to garnishment. This decision was made on the authority of the cases reported in 46 Ga. 466; 54 Id. 108; 25 Id. 571.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lamar v. Chisholm, 77 Ga. 306 (Ga. 1886).
77 Ga. 306 (Lamar v. Chisholm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Credit Co. v. Parrett
6 La. App. 423 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Howell v. Atkinson
59 S.E. 316 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Armour Packing Co. v. Wynn
46 S.E. 865 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.
25 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Briscoe v. Montgomery & Co.
20 S.E. 40 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Abrahams v. Anderson
5 S.E. 778 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)