Lamar Advertising Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Mobile

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Lamar Advertising Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Mobile

849 So. 2d 931, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 783, 2002 WL 31399590

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 25, 2002·No. 2000458·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

On September 14, 2001, this court, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 841 So.2d 318 (Ma.Civ.App.2001) (table). The Supreme Court of Mabama has reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause. Ex parte Lamar Advertising Co., 849 So.2d 928 (Ala.2002). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

On September 14, 2001, this court, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 841 So.2d 318 (Ma.Civ.App.2001) (table). The Supreme Court of Mabama has reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause. Ex parte Lamar Advertising Co., 849 So.2d 928 (Ala.2002). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Lamar Advertising Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Mobile, 849 So. 2d 931, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 783, 2002 WL 31399590 (Ala. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

849 So. 2d 931 (Lamar Advertising Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Mobile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related