Lamana & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lamana & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.

4 La. App. 563, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 212

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 26, 1926

DocketNo. 10,418

StatusPublished

This text of 4 La. App. 563 (Lamana & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamana & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp., 4 La. App. 563, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 212 (La. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

CLAIBORNE, J.

This is a suit for services rendered and for the return of a deposit of money.

Plaintiff alleged that on June 17, 1925, it made a contract with the defendant' by which the latter agreed to employ the funeral services of plaintiff for the sum of $108 for each funeral service and for which plaintiff deposited with the defendant $108; that in accordance with said agreement the defendant placed with the plaintiff on August 29, 1925, the burial of one Couvillon for which they failed to pay $108; that thereupon plaintiff notified the defendant on December 30, 1925, that they would not handle their business in the future and requesting the return of their deposit. They pray for judgment for $216.

Judgment by . default was rendered against the defendant. The defendant appealed.

Due proof was made of plaintiff’s claim.

In this court defendant has failed to appear either by argument or by brief.

We see no error in the judgment which is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLAIBORNE, J.

This is a suit for services rendered and for the return of a deposit of money.

Plaintiff alleged that on June 17, 1925, it made a contract with the defendant' by which the latter agreed to employ the funeral services of plaintiff for the sum of $108 for each funeral service and for which plaintiff deposited with the defendant $108; that in accordance with said agreement the defendant placed with the plaintiff on August 29, 1925, the burial of one Couvillon for which they failed to pay $108; that thereupon plaintiff notified the defendant on December 30, 1925, that they would not handle their business in the future and requesting the return of their deposit. They pray for judgment for $216.

Judgment by . default was rendered against the defendant. The defendant appealed.

Due proof was made of plaintiff’s claim.

In this court defendant has failed to appear either by argument or by brief.

We see no error in the judgment which is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 La. App. 563, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamana-co-v-community-burial-service-corp-lactapp-1926.