Lamage v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lamage v. Goord

21 A.D.3d 633, 799 N.Y.S.2d 329, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8288

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 4, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A.D.3d 633 (Lamage v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamage v. Goord, 21 A.D.3d 633, 799 N.Y.S.2d 329, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPDR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits fighting. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Reyes v Goord, 6 AD3d 781 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPDR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits fighting. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Reyes v Goord, 6 AD3d 781 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.3d 633, 799 N.Y.S.2d 329, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamage-v-goord-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack