Lamadrid v. Santana-Izquierdo

920 So. 2d 126, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 689, 2006 WL 167999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 2006
DocketNo. 3D04-871
StatusPublished

This text of 920 So. 2d 126 (Lamadrid v. Santana-Izquierdo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamadrid v. Santana-Izquierdo, 920 So. 2d 126, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 689, 2006 WL 167999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Loadholtz v. Andrews, 855 So.2d 1241, 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hawkins v. Schofman, 204 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawkins v. Schofman
204 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Loadholtz v. Andrews
855 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 So. 2d 126, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 689, 2006 WL 167999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamadrid-v-santana-izquierdo-fladistctapp-2006.