Lama Drilling Co. v. Latham Exploration Co.

Fifth Circuit

Lama Drilling Co. v. Latham Exploration Co.

832 F.2d 1391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15632

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 1, 1987

DocketNo. 87-4421

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 832 F.2d 1391 (Lama Drilling Co. v. Latham Exploration Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lama Drilling Co. v. Latham Exploration Co., 832 F.2d 1391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15632 (5th Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

As the district court correctly noted, in reviewing actions taken by such a court in its appellate function — actions such as the dismissal in today’s case — we have announced that we affirm unless the court has clearly abused its discretion. In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., 774 F.2d 1303, 1305 (5th Cir.1985). For the reasons well stated in the court’s “Memorandum Ruling” filed May 11, 1987, there was no abuse of the court’s discretion here; and for us to meddle in its disposition would be, as our Brother Rubin has gracefully stated in Braniff, to “deny in action what we have announced as precept.” Id.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

As the district court correctly noted, in reviewing actions taken by such a court in its appellate function — actions such as the dismissal in today’s case — we have announced that we affirm unless the court has clearly abused its discretion. In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., 774 F.2d 1303, 1305 (5th Cir.1985). For the reasons well stated in the court’s “Memorandum Ruling” filed May 11, 1987, there was no abuse of the court’s discretion here; and for us to meddle in its disposition would be, as our Brother Rubin has gracefully stated in Braniff, to “deny in action what we have announced as precept.” Id.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

832 F.2d 1391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lama-drilling-co-v-latham-exploration-co-ca5-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack