Lalota v. Guido

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lalota v. Guido

57 A.D.2d 838, 393 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12046

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1977·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and fined him one half day’s pay. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The respondent’s determination finding petitioner guilty of the charge herein is supported by substantial evidence. We do not find that the fine imposed requires judicial correction (see Matter of O’Connor v Frank, 38 NY2d 963; Matter of Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182, 184-185). Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and fined him one half day’s pay. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The respondent’s determination finding petitioner guilty of the charge herein is supported by substantial evidence. We do not find that the fine imposed requires judicial correction (see Matter of O’Connor v Frank, 38 NY2d 963; Matter of Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182, 184-185). Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Lalota v. Guido, 57 A.D.2d 838, 393 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

57 A.D.2d 838 (Lalota v. Guido) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related