Lally v. Mindnich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lally v. Mindnich

175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 964 (Lally v. Mindnich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lally v. Mindnich, 175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order of County Court and judgment of Justice’s Court reversed, and a new trial granted in the County Court, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Held, that the trial court erroneously rejected testimony offered on the part of the defendant to show plaintiff’s inability to perform the services for which he was originally employed. 3. That the verdict of the jury is clearly against the weight of the evidence. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and De Angelis, J., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order of County Court and judgment of Justice’s Court reversed, and a new trial granted in the County Court, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Held, that the trial court erroneously rejected testimony offered on the part of the defendant to show plaintiff’s inability to perform the services for which he was originally employed. 3. That the verdict of the jury is clearly against the weight of the evidence. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and De Angelis, J., who dissented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lally-v-mindnich-nyappdiv-1916.