Lalawi v. Holder
This text of Lalawi v. Holder (Lalawi v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1650
ABRAHAM LALAWI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: January 27, 2009 Decided: February 10, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Armin A. Skalmowski, LAW OFFICES OF ARMIN A. SKALMOWSKI, Alhambra, California, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Barry J. Pettinato, Assistant Director, Tim Ramnitz, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Abraham Lalawi, a native and citizen of Indonesia,
seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the
administrative record and Lalawi’s claims and find no abuse of
discretion in the Board’s decision declining to reopen removal
proceedings. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2008). We
accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In re: Lalawi (B.I.A. May 9, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lalawi v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lalawi-v-holder-ca4-2009.