Lalawi v. Holder

311 F. App'x 653
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2009·No. No. 08-1650·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abraham Lalawi, a native and citizen of Indonesia, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Lalawi’s claims and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s decision declining to reopen removal proceedings. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2008). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Lalawi (B.I.A. May 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lalawi v. Holder, 311 F. App'x 653 (4th Cir. 2009).

311 F. App'x 653 (Lalawi v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related