Lalawi v. Gonzales
This text of Lalawi v. Gonzales (Lalawi v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2518
ABRAHAM LALAWI,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 05-1154
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-341-112)
Submitted: July 15, 2005 Decided: August 8, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Armin A. Skalmowski, Alhambra, California, for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Brian E. Bentley, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated petitions for review, Abraham
Lalawi, a native and citizen of Indonesia who claims he is a
Christian of Chinese ethnicity, seeks review of orders issued by
the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to
reopen removal proceedings (No. 04-2518) and denying his motion to
reconsider that order (No. 05-1154). We have reviewed the
administrative record and conclude the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying Lalawi’s motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a),
(b) (2005).
We accordingly deny the petitions for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lalawi v. Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lalawi-v-gonzales-ca4-2005.