Lalas v. Barnes

795 So. 2d 1107, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876, 2001 WL 1168216
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2001
DocketNo. 1D01-99
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 795 So. 2d 1107 (Lalas v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lalas v. Barnes, 795 So. 2d 1107, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876, 2001 WL 1168216 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a final judgment rendered in their favor, appellants raise two points. We affirm the first point without discussion. In the second point, appellants argue that the trial court erred in denying their motion to amend the complaint to add punitive damages against one of the defendants, Eagle Supply, Inc., the employer of the tortfeasor. We affirm on this point as well because no basis has been shown for punitive damages against the employer. See Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 644-45 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardick v. Homol
795 So. 2d 1107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 So. 2d 1107, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876, 2001 WL 1168216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lalas-v-barnes-fladistctapp-2001.