Lalani v. Santiago

248 A.D.2d 595, 669 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2950
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 595 (Lalani v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lalani v. Santiago, 248 A.D.2d 595, 669 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of General Business Law § 349, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated February 27, 1997, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment upon their failure to serve an answer and denied their cross motion for leave to serve an answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[596]*596In order to establish entitlement to vacatur of a default in interposing an answer, the defendants were required to establish the existence of a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense (see, Rebeil Consulting Corp. v Kappa Realty Corp., 244 AD2d 540; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). The defendants failed to do so.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lalani v. Santiago
290 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Santiago v. Lalani
256 A.D.2d 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 595, 669 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lalani-v-santiago-nyappdiv-1998.