Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie

235 A.D.2d 423, 652 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 423 (Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie, 235 A.D.2d 423, 652 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Palella, J.), dated November 9, 1995, which, inter alia, reduced the assessment of the petitioner’s real property for the 1992 tax year.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A review of the appraisal report prepared by the petitioner’s appraiser reveals that it complies with 22 NYCRR 202.59 (g) (2). It clearly contains a statement of the method of appraisal relied on, the conclusion as to value reached by the appraiser, and the facts, figures, and calculations by which that conclusion was reached.

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Palella, J.), dated November 9, 1995, which, inter alia, reduced the assessment of the petitioner’s real property for the 1992 tax year.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A review of the appraisal report prepared by the petitioner’s appraiser reveals that it complies with 22 NYCRR 202.59 (g) (2). It clearly contains a statement of the method of appraisal relied on, the conclusion as to value reached by the appraiser, and the facts, figures, and calculations by which that conclusion was reached.

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 423, 652 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakr-associates-v-board-of-assessors-for-city-of-poughkeepsie-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack