Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie

235 A.D.2d 423, 652 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 172
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Palella, J.), dated November 9, 1995, which, inter alia, reduced the assessment of the petitioner’s real property for the 1992 tax year.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A review of the appraisal report prepared by the petitioner’s appraiser reveals that it complies with 22 NYCRR 202.59 (g) (2). It clearly contains a statement of the method of appraisal relied on, the conclusion as to value reached by the appraiser, and the facts, figures, and calculations by which that conclusion was reached.

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie, 235 A.D.2d 423, 652 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 423 (Lakr Associates v. Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jo-Be Properties, LLC v. Board of Assessors
69 A.D.3d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)