Lakin v. Rund

873 N.W.2d 590, 499 Mich. 860
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 2016·No. No. 151367; Court of Appeals No. 323695·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider (1) whether publication of an allegedly false and defamatory statement imputing to another conduct constituting the criminal offense of battery is actionable irrespective of special harm, see, e.g., Mains v Whiting, 87 Mich 172, 180 (1891); Taylor v Kneeland, 1 Doug 67, 72 (1843) (holding that words charging a person with a crime are not actionable per se unless the crime involves moral turpitude or would subject the person to an infamous punishment); and (2) whether the statement at issue in this case imputed to the plaintiff the criminal offense of battery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lakin v. Rund, 873 N.W.2d 590, 499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016).

873 N.W.2d 590 (Lakin v. Rund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016