Lakey v. McCarroll

Court of Appeals of Texas

Lakey v. McCarroll

137 S.W.2d 819

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 2, 1940

DocketNo. 1891.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 137 S.W.2d 819 (Lakey v. McCarroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lakey v. McCarroll, 137 S.W.2d 819 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

On April 14, 1939, this court handed down an opinion in the above-styled and numbered cause. The same is to be found in Tex. *820 Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 181. A motion for rehearing was filed therein, and the same has not been acted upon by this court. In the consideration of that motion this court concluded to certify certain questions to the Supreme Court of Texas. Also, there was a dissenting opinion in said cause by Associate Justice Funderburk. 131 S.W.2d 185. The questions certified are to he found in the opinion of the Supreme Court answering said questions. Lakey v. McCarroll, Tex.Sup., 134 S.W.2d 1016 (not yet published [in State Reports]).

According to the opinion of the Supreme Court there was error in this court’s disposition of said case. In the light of the answers to the questions certified, the judgment of the trial court should have been affirmed. Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is granted, and pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

On April 14, 1939, this court handed down an opinion in the above-styled and numbered cause. The same is to be found in Tex. *820 Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 181. A motion for rehearing was filed therein, and the same has not been acted upon by this court. In the consideration of that motion this court concluded to certify certain questions to the Supreme Court of Texas. Also, there was a dissenting opinion in said cause by Associate Justice Funderburk. 131 S.W.2d 185. The questions certified are to he found in the opinion of the Supreme Court answering said questions. Lakey v. McCarroll, Tex.Sup., 134 S.W.2d 1016 (not yet published [in State Reports]).

According to the opinion of the Supreme Court there was error in this court’s disposition of said case. In the light of the answers to the questions certified, the judgment of the trial court should have been affirmed. Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is granted, and pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.W.2d 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakey-v-mccarroll-texapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack