Lakewood Lumber & Supply Co. v. Hughes

167 S.E. 518, 176 Ga. 239, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 53
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1933
DocketNo. 9111
StatusPublished

This text of 167 S.E. 518 (Lakewood Lumber & Supply Co. v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lakewood Lumber & Supply Co. v. Hughes, 167 S.E. 518, 176 Ga. 239, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 53 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The exception is by a materialman who furnished supplies, to a decree giving priority to laborers. “The following liens are established in this State: 1. Liens in favor of the State, counties, and municipal corporations for taxes. 2. Liens in favor of creditors by judgment and decree. 3. Liens in favor of laborers. . . 8. Liens in favor of contractors, materialmen, machinists, and manufacturers of machinery.” Civil Code, § 3329. “Laborers shall have a general lien upon the property of their employers, liable to levy and sale, for their labor, which is hereby declared to be superior to all other liens, except liens for taxes, the special liens of landlords on yearly crops, and such other liens as are declared by law to be superior to them.” § 3334. “Laborers shall also have a special .lien on the products of their labor, superior to all other liens, except liens for taxes, and special liens of landlords on yearly crops, to which they shall be inferior.” § 3335. Applying the above principles to the facts of the case, the court did not err, as against the plaintiff, in finding that, after the payment of the costs of the proceedings, including all fees, expenses, taxes, and municipal assessments, those parties who furnished labor used in the improvement of the property, and who had within the three-month period recorded a lien against the land, were first entitled to be paid in full, and that certain par[242]*242ties who furnished material used in the improvement of the propertjq who had likewise recorded their lien, were next entitled to share in the funds. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 518, 176 Ga. 239, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakewood-lumber-supply-co-v-hughes-ga-1933.