Lakewood Construction Co. v. Brody

1 A.D.2d 1010, 767 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1 A.D.3d 1010, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12300
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 2003·No. Appeal No. 4·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Ringrose, J.), entered November 14, 2002, which granted in part the cross motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the amended third-party complaint.

[1011]*1011It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying in its entirety third-party defendant’s cross motion and reinstating in its entirety the amended third-party complaint and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Lakewood Constr. Co. ([appeal No. 1] 1 AD3d 1007 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lakewood Construction Co. v. Brody, 1 A.D.2d 1010, 767 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1 A.D.3d 1010, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.2d 1010 (Lakewood Construction Co. v. Brody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. Conley
1 A.D.2d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)