Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Finn

2019 NY Slip Op 7173
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2019
Docket861 CA 19-00002
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 7173 (Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Finn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Finn, 2019 NY Slip Op 7173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v Finn (2019 NY Slip Op 07173)
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v Finn
2019 NY Slip Op 07173
Decided on October 4, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 4, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

861 CA 19-00002

[*1]LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

MARK EDWARD FINN, LINDA FINN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.


LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., GENEVA (AMARIS ELLIOTT-ENGEL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL, LLP, LATHAM (GREGORY J. SANDA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wayne County (John B. Nesbitt, A.J.), entered April 2, 2018. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment and appointed a referee.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In this residential foreclosure action, Mark Edward Finn and Linda Finn (defendants) appeal from an order granting plaintiff's motion for, inter alia, summary judgment on the complaint and an order of reference. A final judgment of foreclosure and sale was subsequently entered in this action, and defendants did not appeal from that judgment. Inasmuch as "[t]he right to appeal from an intermediate order terminates with the entry of a final judgment" (Matter of Scott v Manilla , 203 AD2d 972, 973 [4th Dept 1994]; see generally CPLR 5501 [a] [1]), this appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed (see Matter of Aho , 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]).

Entered: October 4, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Scott v. Manilla
203 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 7173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakeview-loan-servicing-llc-v-finn-nyappdiv-2019.