Lakeview Lawn & Landscape, Inc. v. Intra-State Contracting Corp.
This text of 278 A.D.2d 816 (Lakeview Lawn & Landscape, Inc. v. Intra-State Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendants appeal from a judgment, entered following a bench trial, awarding plaintiff $44,952.46 for goods and services supplied by it pursuant to a subcontract with defendant Intra-State Contracting Corporation (Intra-State). Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff was not contractually bound to procure a maintenance bond guaranteeing its work. The subcontract does not refer to a maintenance bond, nor does it expressly incorporate any such provision of the underlying prime contract. The court also properly concluded that defendant must pay the balance due on plaintiff’s invoices, appropriately crediting evidence that plaintiff installed all of the sod it delivered to the site and billed only for sod actually installed. With regard to the conflicting measurements of the sod, we find no basis to disturb the court’s determination to credit plaintiffs evidence over the testimony of defendants’ surveyor (see, Executive Park W. I v Jung, 224 AD2d 990, 991, lv denied 88 NY2d 803). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J. — Contract.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 A.D.2d 816, 718 N.Y.S.2d 536, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakeview-lawn-landscape-inc-v-intra-state-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-2000.