Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court
This text of 9 Cal. 2d 779 (Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court, and in particular, Judge Schmidt, to settle a reporter’s transcript on appeal. On August 26, 1936, we issued an order to show cause directed to respondents.
Our decision in Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co., L. A. No. 15888 (ante, p. 16 [68 Pac. (2d) 968]), this day filed, disposes of the present case.
The petition is denied.
Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Cal. 2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakeview-creamery-co-v-superior-court-cal-1937.