Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court

68 P.2d 971, 9 Cal. 2d 779, 1937 Cal. LEXIS 456
California Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1937·No. L. A. No. 16003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court, and in particular, Judge Schmidt, to settle a reporter’s transcript on appeal. On August 26, 1936, we issued an order to show cause directed to respondents.

Our decision in Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co., L. A. No. 15888 (ante, p. 16 [68 Pac. (2d) 968]), this day filed, disposes of the present case.

The petition is denied.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court, 68 P.2d 971, 9 Cal. 2d 779, 1937 Cal. LEXIS 456 (Cal. 1937).

68 P.2d 971 (Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.
68 P.2d 968 (California Supreme Court, 1937)