Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court

9 Cal. 2d 779
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 1937
DocketL. A. No. 16003
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cal. 2d 779 (Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court, 9 Cal. 2d 779 (Cal. 1937).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court, and in particular, Judge Schmidt, to settle a reporter’s transcript on appeal. On August 26, 1936, we issued an order to show cause directed to respondents.

Our decision in Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co., L. A. No. 15888 (ante, p. 16 [68 Pac. (2d) 968]), this day filed, disposes of the present case.

The petition is denied.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.
68 P.2d 968 (California Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cal. 2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakeview-creamery-co-v-superior-court-cal-1937.