Lakesha Peterson v. Cameron Hancock
This text of Lakesha Peterson v. Cameron Hancock (Lakesha Peterson v. Cameron Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 15, 2015
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00113-CV
LAKESHA PETERSON, Appellant V. CAMERON HANCOCK, Appellee
On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-20377
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By
postcard dated January 28, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed
appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to
do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated January 28, 2015, we
notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant
to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so
might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated March 26, 2015, we informed appellant
the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to
pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or
arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to
do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has
not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or
otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).
150113F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
LAKESHA PETERSON, Appellant On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00113-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-20377. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. CAMERON HANCOCK, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee CAMERON HANCOCK recover the costs of this appeal from appellant LAKESHA PETERSON.
Judgment entered June 15, 2015.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lakesha Peterson v. Cameron Hancock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakesha-peterson-v-cameron-hancock-texapp-2015.