Lakeisha Scott v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 6, 2015
Docket01-14-01031-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lakeisha Scott v. State (Lakeisha Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lakeisha Scott v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-14-01031-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/6/2015 10:14:46 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS LAKEISHA SCOTT § 2/6/2015 10:14:46 PM APPELLANT § CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE VS. § Clerk § CASE NO. 01-14-01031-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLEE §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Marcus J. Fleming, counsel for appellant, LAKEISHA SCOTT, makes this motion per Rule

73 and 74(n) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and moves this Court for an extension of

time to file appellant's brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows:

I.

Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under Tex. R. App. P. 73(a), as an appeal from a

conviction entered by the 263RD District Court of Harris County and styled, The State of Texas v.

LAKEISHA SCOTT, in cause no. 1387553.

II.

The court’s record has been filed. Counsel has not requested a previous extension of time to

file appellant's brief.

III.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that this Court may grant a request for an

extension of time to file appellant's brief, upon a showing of a reasonable explanation of the need

for time. Tex. R. App. 73(n). IV.

Counsel for appellant has been required to attend to numerous cases in and out of the

courtroom which required a great deal of attention. Counsel is currently preparing for the

following jury trials scheduled for the month of February in Galveston County:

-State vs. Raymond Vargas; Cause no. 14CR0997; 405th District Court; -State vs. Rodolfo Rodriguez; Cause no. 14CR1234; 56th District Court; and -State vs. Taleisen Hill; Cause no. 14CR1603; 56th District Court.

Counsel is also researching and briefing two additional appeals:

-Eric Martin vs. State of Texas; 14-14-00761-CR / 14-14-00762-CR (Sexual Asslt Child) ; and -Omar Ibrahim vs. State of Texas; 1-14-00785-CR (Murder).

The requested extension of time in which to file appellant's brief is necessary to adequately

represent appellant by insuring that counsel has fully researched the law and issues applicable to this

appeal. This motion is neither frivolous nor filed for the purpose of delay but is filed so that the

interests of justice may be served and that no rights and privileges of appellant are harmed and

prejudiced but are adequately protected.

PRAYER

Counsel for appellant prays the Court to grant permission for a sixty (60) day extension of

time to file appellant's brief beyond the filing date of this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Marcus J. Fleming

Marcus J. Fleming State Bar No. 00784058 9219 Katy Freeway, Suite 220 Houston, Texas 77024 (713) 224-1970 Phone (832) 649-3932 Fax CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on this the 6th day of February, 2015 a true and correct copy of the

foregoing was forwarded to all counsel of record pursuant to Rules 72 and 21a of the Texas Rules of

Procedure.

Marcus J. Fleming

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lakeisha Scott v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lakeisha-scott-v-state-texapp-2015.