Lake View School District No. 25 v. Huckabee

145 S.W.3d 382, 356 Ark. 5, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 68
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lake View School District No. 25 v. Huckabee. Read the opinion of the Court — 351 Ark. 31
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 5, 2004·No. 01-836·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We grant the motion to expedite this court’s review. We deny, however, the motion to remand for limited purposes, as a remand is unnecessary. This court has said that matters collateral or supplemental to a trial court’s judgment, such as attorney’s fees, are left within the trial court’s jurisdiction even though an appeal to this court has been docketed. See, e.g., Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Prod. Co., 320 Ark. 298, 896 S.W.2d 867 (1995); Alexander v. First Nat’l Bank of Ft. Smith, 278 Ark. 406, 646 S.W.2d 684 (1983). Accordingly, the trial court may consider and resolve matters pertaining to attorney’s fees ordered by this court in the instant case regardless of the fact that this court has reestablished jurisdiction over the matter.

Imbek, J., not participating. Special Justice Carol Dalby joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake View School District No. 25 v. Huckabee, 145 S.W.3d 382, 356 Ark. 5, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 68 (Ark. 2004).

145 S.W.3d 382 (Lake View School District No. 25 v. Huckabee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF FORT SMITH
646 S.W.2d 684 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1983)
Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.
896 S.W.2d 867 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)