Lake v. Stiegler

156 So. 2d 785
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1963
DocketNo. 63-87
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 So. 2d 785 (Lake v. Stiegler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lake v. Stiegler, 156 So. 2d 785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, appeals an adverse summary judgment, contending that there was a material issue of fact to be presented to the jury as to whether or not the appellee negligently operated a motor vehicle under his control.

An examination of the record fails to demonstrate that the appellee acted other than as a reasonable person under the emergency circumstances created by the appellant-driver. Therefore, no error has been made to appear in the entry of the summary judgment. See: Harper v. Mangel, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 346.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cahill ex rel. Utz v. Cooney
182 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Pan American Life Insurance Company v. Raij
156 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 2d 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-v-stiegler-fladistctapp-1963.