Lake v. Lake

14 So. 3d 284, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10747, 2009 WL 2382338
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 5, 2009
Docket3D08-2525
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 So. 3d 284 (Lake v. Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lake v. Lake, 14 So. 3d 284, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10747, 2009 WL 2382338 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Confession of Error

Arthur D. Lake appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage as well as an order awarding his former wife attorneys fees and costs. Based on the former husband’s failure to file a conformed copy of the final judgment and our subsequent dismissal of the appeal as to that judgment, we are left to consider only the order awarding fees and costs. On our independent review of the record, as well as the former wife’s confession of error, we reverse the fee order and remand for further proceedings.

The parties entered into a marital settlement agreement which was incorporated into a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. When a post-judgment dispute arose over each party’s responsibilities under the final judgment, the former wife moved to enforce the final judgment. Citing the trial judge’s conduct during the hearing held on the matter, the former husband filed a motion to disqualify. This motion was granted, and the trial judge recused himself. Thereafter the same judge entered an order awarding attorneys fees and costs to the former wife’s counsel.

Once the trial judge recused himself, he had no further authority to enter orders. See Bolt v. Smith, 594 So.2d 864, 864 (Fla. *285 5th DCA 1992) (“Florida case law is well settled that once a trial judge has recused himself, further orders of the recused judge are void and have no effect.”).

On this authority and the former wife’s confession of error, we reverse the fee order and remand for further proceedings before a successor judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plaza v. Plaza
21 So. 3d 181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 So. 3d 284, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10747, 2009 WL 2382338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-v-lake-fladistctapp-2009.