Lake v. Lake

450 So. 2d 348, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1984·No. No. 83-2478·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the award of rehabilitative alimony and child support because there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion. See Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Lopez v. Lopez, 438 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We remand, however, so that the trial court may adjudicate the remaining issues not disposed of in the final judgment, specifically, a division of personal property acquired and debts incurred by the parties during the course of the marriage, and provision for medical insurance coverage for the minor child.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake v. Lake, 450 So. 2d 348, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

450 So. 2d 348 (Lake v. Lake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Conner v. Conner
439 So. 2d 887 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Lopez v. Lopez
438 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)