Lake v. Chang

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 12, 2021
DocketSCPW-21-0000510
StatusPublished

This text of Lake v. Chang (Lake v. Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lake v. Chang, (haw 2021).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 12-OCT-2021 10:59 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MARCUS PONO LAKE, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the registered holder of Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-HE7 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE7; VIOLA INNOCENCIA FAO; LANIKUHANA PATIO HOMES; 1326 KEEAUMOKU LLC; MILILANI TOWN ASSOCIATION; STEPHEN W. FISHER, individually and as Trustee for the Stephen W. Fischer Revocable Trust; REALTY PROFESSIONALS LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company; and JRS HUI, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civil No. 1CC151001975)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Marcus Lake’s petition

for writ of mandamus, and the record, on September 28, 2021, the

circuit court entered an “Order Denying ‘Defendant, Crossclaim

Plaintiff, and Third-Party Plaintiff Marcus Pono Lake’s Motion

for Summary Judgment’ Filed on March 14, 2019,” thereby ruling on petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, which is the subject of

the petition. The relief that petitioner seeks in the petition

has been addressed by the circuit court’s order and, thus, the

requested extraordinary writ is not necessary. See Kema v.

Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a

writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue

unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right

to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately

the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is

denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 12, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lake v. Chang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-v-chang-haw-2021.