Lake v. Chang
This text of Lake v. Chang (Lake v. Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 12-OCT-2021 10:59 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
MARCUS PONO LAKE, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
and
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the registered holder of Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-HE7 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE7; VIOLA INNOCENCIA FAO; LANIKUHANA PATIO HOMES; 1326 KEEAUMOKU LLC; MILILANI TOWN ASSOCIATION; STEPHEN W. FISHER, individually and as Trustee for the Stephen W. Fischer Revocable Trust; REALTY PROFESSIONALS LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company; and JRS HUI, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civil No. 1CC151001975)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Marcus Lake’s petition
for writ of mandamus, and the record, on September 28, 2021, the
circuit court entered an “Order Denying ‘Defendant, Crossclaim
Plaintiff, and Third-Party Plaintiff Marcus Pono Lake’s Motion
for Summary Judgment’ Filed on March 14, 2019,” thereby ruling on petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, which is the subject of
the petition. The relief that petitioner seeks in the petition
has been addressed by the circuit court’s order and, thus, the
requested extraordinary writ is not necessary. See Kema v.
Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a
writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue
unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right
to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately
the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,
It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is
denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 12, 2021.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lake v. Chang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-v-chang-haw-2021.