Lake Towers, Inc. v. A. T. Euster Furniture Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lake Towers, Inc. v. A. T. Euster Furniture Co.

174 So. 2d 448, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 27, 1965

DocketNo. 64-882

StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 2d 448 (Lake Towers, Inc. v. A. T. Euster Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lake Towers, Inc. v. A. T. Euster Furniture Co., 174 So. 2d 448, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an action by a furniture supplier against the owner of an apartment building to recover a $12,000 balance claimed to be due under a furniture sale contract which aggregated $92,748.81. An apartment to be occupied by the then manager was furnished at greater cost than the average for the other apartments. The amount sued for represented part of the cost of furniture for the manager’s apartment. The defense was that the sale had been made to the manager and not to the apartment building owner. On the trial, which was held without a jury, the trial judge resolved the conflicting evidence and [449]*449found the sale was to the defendant and not to the manager. The trial judge’s ruling, which is entitled to the weight of a jury verdict, finds adequate support in the record. No error having been made to appear the judgment should be and hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was an action by a furniture supplier against the owner of an apartment building to recover a $12,000 balance claimed to be due under a furniture sale contract which aggregated $92,748.81. An apartment to be occupied by the then manager was furnished at greater cost than the average for the other apartments. The amount sued for represented part of the cost of furniture for the manager’s apartment. The defense was that the sale had been made to the manager and not to the apartment building owner. On the trial, which was held without a jury, the trial judge resolved the conflicting evidence and [449]*449found the sale was to the defendant and not to the manager. The trial judge’s ruling, which is entitled to the weight of a jury verdict, finds adequate support in the record. No error having been made to appear the judgment should be and hereby is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 So. 2d 448, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-towers-inc-v-a-t-euster-furniture-co-fladistctapp-1965.