Lake Superior Piling Co. v. Mobile Oil Corp.

502 So. 2d 581
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 12, 1987
DocketNo. CA094985
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 581 (Lake Superior Piling Co. v. Mobile Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lake Superior Piling Co. v. Mobile Oil Corp., 502 So. 2d 581 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In considering appellant’s application for a rehearing, we have reviewed the affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment as if same was filed timely. We conclude that this affidavit does not meet the criteria of La. Code Civ. P. art. 967. The factual allegations made in the affidavit were not based on the personal knowledge of the affiant, nor would the evidence submitted with the affidavit be admissible at trial as proof of the facts alleged. An assertion in an affidavit in opposition to a motion for summary judgment that is based on “the best of [affi-ant’s] knowledge and belief” is insufficient.

CARTER, J., dissents from the denial of the rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peters v. Bogalusa Community Medical Center
117 So. 3d 538 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
Spears v. Bradford
652 So. 2d 628 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
Arkla, Inc. v. Maddox and May Bros. Casing Service, Inc.
624 So. 2d 34 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 So. 2d 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-superior-piling-co-v-mobile-oil-corp-lactapp-1987.