Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad

96 Ill. 125
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.:

So far as we can gather from the suggestions made in support of this motion, the grounds alleged, if available at all to the party relying upon them, appear to be of a character such as may be interposed as a defence at law in the condemnation proceedings now pending in the county court, so that, even conceding that this court has the power to order a stay of those proceedings, it would not be an appropriate exercise of such a jurisdiction. The defence being of a character which may be made at law, there is no reason for ordering a stay of proceedings in the court in which it may be interposed.

Should the defence not be allowed in the county court,-the railroad companies have their remedy by appeal to the proper tribunal, where the case may be reviewed.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad, 96 Ill. 125 (Ill. 1880).

96 Ill. 125 (Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago
37 N.E. 842 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)
Illinois Central Railroad v. City of Chicago
138 Ill. 453 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1891)