Lake Providence Bank v. Winter
177 F. 1003, 100 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4451
This text of 177 F. 1003 (Lake Providence Bank v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lake Providence Bank v. Winter, 177 F. 1003, 100 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4451 (5th Cir. 1910).
Opinion
The evidence is not sufficient to show that the claimant hank paid the noie in question with its own funds. We concur in the opinion of the referee, found in the record, holding that appellant’s claim be rejected and disallowed. As the trustee took no appeal, and seems to be satisfied with the judgment as given by the court below, the same is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
177 F. 1003, 100 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-providence-bank-v-winter-ca5-1910.