Lake Providence Bank v. Winter

177 F. 1003, 100 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4451

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence is not sufficient to show that the claimant hank paid the noie in question with its own funds. We concur in the opinion of the referee, found in the record, holding that appellant’s claim be rejected and disallowed. As the trustee took no appeal, and seems to be satisfied with the judgment as given by the court below, the same is affirmed.