Lake Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. New York Central Railroad
This text of 92 N.E.2d 221 (Lake Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This Court ordered transfer of this appeal because of certain incorrect statements of law contained in the opinion rendered herein by the Appellate Court.
Upon examination of appellant’s brief we find that the errors relied upon for reversal involve the refusal of certain tendered instructions, the giving of others, the rejection of certain evidence, and the striking out of portions of appellant’s complaint. We also-find that the appellant’s brief does not contain the complaint, the appellee’s motion to strike parts of the complaint, the appellee’s answer and counter-claim, nor the objections to the instructions which were given. In order to fully present each of these claimed errors the above portions of the record or parts of same so omitted necessarily should have been concisely set out in appellant’s brief. ‘See Rule 2-17, subdivision (e), 1946 Revision, which was in force when this appeal was taken. See also Rule 2-17, 1949 Revision. This court will not search the record in order to reverse.
No questions having been presented the judgment is affirmed.
Note.—Reported in 92 N. E. 2d 221.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.E.2d 221, 228 Ind. 371, 1950 Ind. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-motor-freight-line-inc-v-new-york-central-railroad-ind-1950.