Lake County v. Orland Twp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Lake County v. Orland Twp.

240 N.W. 861, 59 S.D. 499

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lake County v. Orland Twp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 S.D. 340 →

South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1932·No. File No. 7038·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause was orally argued October 3, 1931, and an opinion filed December 19, 1931, reported in 59 S. D. 340, 239 N. W. 852. Thereafter a rehearing was granted because by inadvertence some of the counsel entitled to notice of [500]*500oral argument had failed to receive the same. The case was again presented on oral argument on rehearing on Friday, February 5, 1932-

FIaving carefully considered the further arguments of counsel as advanced on the rehearing, we are not disposed to recede from the views announced in the former opinion. That opinion is therefore adhered to, and the orders appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause was orally argued October 3, 1931, and an opinion filed December 19, 1931, reported in 59 S. D. 340, 239 N. W. 852. Thereafter a rehearing was granted because by inadvertence some of the counsel entitled to notice of [500]*500oral argument had failed to receive the same. The case was again presented on oral argument on rehearing on Friday, February 5, 1932-

FIaving carefully considered the further arguments of counsel as advanced on the rehearing, we are not disposed to recede from the views announced in the former opinion. That opinion is therefore adhered to, and the orders appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur.

Lake County v. Orland Twp., 240 N.W. 861, 59 S.D. 499 (S.D. 1932).

Pincite

240 N.W. 861 (Lake County v. Orland Twp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related