Lake County v. Fox
This text of 705 So. 2d 702 (Lake County v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lake County seeks a writ of prohibition to stop the trial court from taking any further action on respondent Ronald E. Fox, P.A.’s motion for attorney’s fees. The trial court already issued an order awarding attorney’s fees, without reserving jurisdiction, and no timely appeal of that order was filed. See, e.g., Altamonte Hitch and Trailer Service, Inc. v. U-Haul Co. of Eastern Florida, 483 So.2d 852 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (order awarding attorney’s fee rendered after trial judgment is a final appealable order). Therefore, the trial court is without jurisdiction to reconsider the attorney’s fee award. See, e.g., Friedman v. Grossman, 490 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (prohibition granted to prohibit trial judge from hearing question of attorney’s fees when jurisdiction to consider fees was not reserved).
PETITION GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
705 So. 2d 702, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1199, 1998 WL 55931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-county-v-fox-fladistctapp-1998.