Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Marshall

Ohio Supreme Court

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Marshall

637 N.E.2d 301, 70 Ohio St. 3d 82

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 24, 1994

DocketNo. 94-891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 637 N.E.2d 301 (Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Marshall, 637 N.E.2d 301, 70 Ohio St. 3d 82 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendation of the board. David S. Marshall is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six [84]*84months, and ordered to make full, restitution to his clients. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendation of the board. David S. Marshall is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six [84]*84months, and ordered to make full, restitution to his clients. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

637 N.E.2d 301, 70 Ohio St. 3d 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-county-bar-assn-v-marshall-ohio-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack