Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Lillback

573 N.E.2d 592, 60 Ohio St. 3d 608, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1535
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1991·No. No. D.D. 88-26·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon respondent Larry G. Lillback’s filing of an application for reinstatement.

The court coming now to consider its order of March 15, 1989, suspending respondent, Larry G. Lillback, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years pursuant to Gov. Bar R. V(7)(c) (see 41 Ohio St. 3d 13, 535 N.E. 2d 300), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov. Bar R. V(24). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Larry G. Lillback be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov. Bar R. VI.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Lillback, 573 N.E.2d 592, 60 Ohio St. 3d 608, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1535 (Ohio 1991).

573 N.E.2d 592 (Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Lillback) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lillback v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
640 N.E.2d 250 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)