Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Endres

Ohio Supreme Court

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Endres

660 N.E.2d 1144, 74 Ohio St. 3d 590

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 95-2533·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years, but imposition of this sanction is suspended on the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J-., dissent. [592]*592Cook, J., dissenting. Respondent’s conduct together with his disregard for the disciplinary process warrants a suspension of six months. Moyer, C. J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years, but imposition of this sanction is suspended on the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J-., dissent. [592]*592Cook, J., dissenting. Respondent’s conduct together with his disregard for the disciplinary process warrants a suspension of six months. Moyer, C. J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Endres, 660 N.E.2d 1144, 74 Ohio St. 3d 590 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

660 N.E.2d 1144 (Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Endres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related